The 12th Fleet: Starbase Valhalla

Starfleet Operational Command
Stardate 93220.76


Priority Encrypt Message:
Operational Transfer Request Notice 103-C



Starfleet Operational Command is pleased to announce the unveiling of our new Operational Support Team. Our recruitment officers are looking to assemble a crack-force of knowledgable Captains to help with submitting, reviewing and resolving bug reports. This volunteer force will work closely with our quality assurance testing and bug hunting initiatives. Working in tandem with Star Trek Online's QA team, the Operational Support Team will help ensure that bugs and potential issues are found and resolved as soon as possible. We're looking for dedicated Captains who are up for the challenge!

The Operational Support Team will be a private initiative, open only to a very select number of Captains. We're looking for volunteer members or "Bug Hunters" who can help us track down bugs and issues, leading to their eradication.

Would you like to know more?


'LaughingTrendy'
Recruitment Commander
Starfleet Operational Command
'QueenVaccine'
Vice Admiral
Starfleet Operational Command

thats what tribble is for!

If it helps Devs pin-point and iron out bugs faster, then I'm all for it.

I did something similar in Dark Age of Camelot. It's a neat system, but only if the Dev's actively listen to the issues being brought up by the representatives.

That's true. They can have all the bugs brought to their attention. The question is whether they have the manpower and know-how to fix those bugs.

The STO devs have a history of not listening to bug or negative comments unless it's months after it's released. (Unless the bug is $$$ related then it's patched very quickly).

Hopefully this will help but I remain skeptical.

dyson science destroyer = broken since DR
Veteran space Bridge Officer = Lost specialty since use of Pilot Token


cryptic and bug fixing..... dont make me laugh

cmdraftbrn wrote:dyson science destroyer = broken since DR

Broken Science Destroyer - working as intended

Metrikon wrote:

cmdraftbrn wrote:dyson science destroyer = broken since DR

Broken Science Destroyer - working as intended

more like funnest thing to fly

Sysil wrote:The STO devs have a history of not listening to bug or negative comments unless it's months after it's released. (Unless the bug is $$$ related then it's patched very quickly).

I dunno, I guess it makes sense to me that they prioritise bugs that will cost them money.