Another Enterprise is retirering

Place for all to talk about STO and for 12th Fleet public information exchange. This forum is open to public view.

Moderator: Command

Banekane
Inactive
Posts: 1707
Joined: Thu January 19th, 2012 9:11 am
Captain: Banekane
@handle: @banex9

Re: Another Enterprise is retirering

Post by Banekane »

they want to name the cariers after former presidents so most likely entiprise will be a NASA shuttle thats in development
=/\=------------------------------=/\=
commander Banekane
Section 31, CWG Delta Squad
12th fleet, United Federation of Planets
=/\=------------------------------=/\=

ImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImage

Banekanes Bio
specter177
Inactive
Posts: 455
Joined: Thu October 21st, 2010 11:11 pm
Captain: Sopek
@handle: @specter177
Location: KDAB, Embry-Riddle, Daytona Beach, Fl
Contact:

Re: Another Enterprise is retirering

Post by specter177 »

Doubt it. NASA would probably call the next shuttle the Constitution, like they originally wanted. However, the first Virgin Galactic spaceship is called the Enterprise, so there's that.
Image
User avatar
EricDuckman
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue March 22nd, 2011 2:56 pm
@handle: @EricDuckman

Re: Another Enterprise is retirering

Post by EricDuckman »

I'm not all that disappointed in seeing our Carriers named after great Presidents like George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Dwight D. Eisenhower (see my sig!), John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan.

And to steal a line from Star Trek: "There'll always be another Enterprise." ;)
Image Image Image Image
User avatar
Delwyn
Posts: 1583
Joined: Sat January 14th, 2012 8:59 pm
Captain: Everett Larrimore
@handle: @Delwyn
Location: Chester, Virginia

Re: Another Enterprise is retirering

Post by Delwyn »

I'm fine with the Navy waiting before using the Enterprise name again....it should be reserved for something new and groundbreaking (just like this Enterprise was the first Nuclear powered carrier).
Image
User avatar
Mike
Posts: 2377
Joined: Fri February 19th, 2010 1:25 pm
@handle: @MikeGTC
Location: Belgium

Re: Another Enterprise is retirering

Post by Mike »

Sad news...

Had a poster of this ship in my room since I was 8 years old...
Made a few models of her to...

Doubt they will make her into a museum, U.S.S. Ranger ( Ship used in Voyage Home ) will probably be turned into one, Just like the last U.S.S. Kenedy.
And they can't scuttle her, because of her nuclear reactors.

Here's to hoping they don't wait to long to use the name Enterprise again!
=/\= ================================= =/\=
Lieutenant Mike
United Federation of Planets
The 12th Fleet Science Division Zeta Squad
USS Illustrious NCC 198206
Ready on Arrival
=/\= ================================= =/\=
soonerjrj
Inactive
Posts: 2764
Joined: Tue March 22nd, 2011 1:05 pm
@handle: @soonerjrj

Re: Another Enterprise is retirering

Post by soonerjrj »

She's had a long good life, time for the kids to break their teeth on missions now. :)
farragut79
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat June 4th, 2011 9:53 pm
Captain: Frederick Holtz
@handle: farragut76
Location: Duluth, MN

Re: Another Enterprise is retirering

Post by farragut79 »

Since the more recent naming conventions for the gator carriers (LHAs and LHDs) are historic USN vessels, the new Enterprise would probably be one of the new America-class LHA or if there is enough petitions, the new CVN-80 could become the new Enterprise.
\= ====================== =/\=
Captain Frederick Holtz
Logistics and Supply, CO, Beta Squadron
12th Fleet, United Federation of Planets
=/\= ====================== =/\==/

Image ImageImageImage

ImageImageImage
User avatar
Mike
Posts: 2377
Joined: Fri February 19th, 2010 1:25 pm
@handle: @MikeGTC
Location: Belgium

Re: Another Enterprise is retirering

Post by Mike »

Signed all petitions to name CVN 79 Enterprise...
But think one of the new America class ships will be named Enterprise.
=/\= ================================= =/\=
Lieutenant Mike
United Federation of Planets
The 12th Fleet Science Division Zeta Squad
USS Illustrious NCC 198206
Ready on Arrival
=/\= ================================= =/\=
Fitzgerald
Inactive
Posts: 317
Joined: Thu January 28th, 2010 11:07 pm
Captain: Devin Fitzgerald
@handle: @Fitzgerald
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: Another Enterprise is retirering

Post by Fitzgerald »

A future USS Enterprise will, more than likely, be a carrier as well. The name has become synonymous with them. Like a poster above, seems logical they'll name a future Ford-class supercarrier Enterprise. Certainly as long as there will be a USN there will be a ship called...Enterprise.

As for the USN's curious tradition of ships being named after people, I think it started for two reasons: 1) to make the USN seem different than its parent, the Royal Navy, and 2) to honor particular sailors whose actions are worth emulating, like, in a random example, the USS Samuel G. Roberts (FFG-58) named after a sailor who died while helping save the lives of others.

That's all well and good - honoring and remembering the heroes of the past - but it doesn't make for a very intimidating sounding ship. I mean, what would concern you more, "Sir, the USS Englebert Humperdink is opening fire!" Or, "Sir! The HMS Invincible is on an attack run!"

Oh well. A fighting sailor would say, "Call my ship the USS Lollipop, for all I care, so long as she can fight!"
=/\=--------------------------------------------------------------------=/\=
Presido-class Command Battlecruiser USS Centurion NCC-97001-C
12th Fleet Tactical Division, Beta Squadron
=/\=---------------------------------------------------------------------=/\=
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
specter177
Inactive
Posts: 455
Joined: Thu October 21st, 2010 11:11 pm
Captain: Sopek
@handle: @specter177
Location: KDAB, Embry-Riddle, Daytona Beach, Fl
Contact:

Re: Another Enterprise is retirering

Post by specter177 »

Fitzgerald wrote: Oh well. A fighting sailor would say, "Call my ship the USS Lollipop, for all I care, so long as she can fight!"
Hey, don't knock the Lollipop! It's a good ship!
Image
Post Reply