Page 1 of 2

Debriefing Session 28

Posted: Thu March 19th, 2015 10:11 pm
by Husker
Debriefing Session 28

Image

- Debriefing Session 28
- Location: Mol'Rihan Detention Center, Maximum Security


Subject was brought to the briefing room at 0830 hours. Per normal protocol, she was restrained and accompanied by two armed guards at all times.

Note: Lieutenant Seken was observed speaking to subject when they entered the interrogation room. Recommend he be reassigned and have no further contact with subject.

Interview lasted for approximately three hours. During most of that time, subject gave no response to questions. This has been her normal behavior over the past several weeks.

Silence. Always silence.

Today, however, subject attempted to bargain. Relevant portions of the interview are below:



INTERVIEWER: Today I want to talk about your time with the Iconians. At the time of your capture, you indicated that you had been a hostage of the Iconians.

SUBJECT: I was not captured. I escaped an Iconian prison. I needed your ship to leave.

INTERVIEWER: So you maintain you were a hostage?

SUBJECT: For the purpose of conversation, yes. Let's say I was.

INTERVIEWER: So you have never been an ally of the Iconians.

SUBJECT: I wouldn't go that far.

INTERVIEWER: So you are working with the Iconians?

SUBJECT: I didn't say that, either.

INTERVIEWER: So what are you saying?

SUBJECT: Whether I was captured or rescued by the Iconians is immaterial. You're asking the wrong questions. Always the wrong questions.

INTERVIEWER: So what should I be asking?

SUBJECT: You should be asking what I know about the Iconians now.

INTERVIEWER: And if I asked that, you would tell me?

SUBJECT: No … not with that attitude.

INTERVIEWER: You are a prisoner of the Romulan Republic, awaiting trial for war crimes. My attitude, as you deem it, is not your concern.

SUBJECT: Very well. I am a prisoner of war. I request treatment due someone of my status.

INTERVIEWER: What do you mean?

SUBJECT: I have had no access to legal counsel, as you well know. I am not allowed visitors or adequate recreation time. I am not even given reading material in my cell, and counting the ceiling tiles has become … tiresome.

INTERVIEWER: Cooperate, and I'm sure we can arrange any reasonable accommodations for your … status.

SUBJECT: There you go, changing the rules. If I am a prisoner of war, as you said, then the treaties your government abides by afford me certain rights. If I am not, then I am just your hostage. Does your democratic government keep many such hostages?

INTERVIEWER: The Romulan Republic is not under interrogation here!

SUBJECT: Neither am I.



At that point, subject asked for access to legal counsel. I refused. She then asked for a PADD so she could write messages to counsel. I refused. She is to have no contact with the outside world. She then suggested pen and paper. I refused. In her hands, a pen could be a weapon.


I have agreed to give her a selection of reading material on a PADD locked from read/write access. We should consider her other requests, as well as the inquiry from the Federation ambassador about her treatment, with an eye toward security.

She is dangerous. We cannot let her out.

Re: Debriefing Session 28

Posted: Thu March 19th, 2015 10:16 pm
by WelshAvenger
Husker wrote: She is dangerous. We cannot let her out.
And yet, with numbing inevitability, they're going to.

Is it me or is this whole Iconian storyline just. . . Meh?

Just another rep series to grind.

Re: Debriefing Session 28

Posted: Thu March 19th, 2015 11:45 pm
by Zoberraz
I'm pretty pro-republic, but the incompetence in this is painful.

28 sessions? That's like 20 too many before calling the PC's captain to get another more fruitful talk going.

Re: Debriefing Session 28

Posted: Thu March 19th, 2015 11:56 pm
by Sonda
Interesting.

Re: Debriefing Session 28

Posted: Fri March 20th, 2015 1:50 am
by Amarai
The interviewer should be taken out back and shot for gross incompetency.

Re: Debriefing Session 28

Posted: Fri March 20th, 2015 5:34 am
by Allegiance86
According to Geko. The whole Debrief is a commentary on the U.S. Gitmo thing. Or atleast thats what he alluded to on twitter today.

Re: Debriefing Session 28

Posted: Fri March 20th, 2015 8:44 am
by Prototype_No.98
Amarai wrote:The interviewer should be taken out back and shot for gross incompetency.
I have to agree, the writing is cringe worthy.

As for the Iconians, they should not be in the game and are probably better off as persistent looming threat that dosent show its face for suspense value. However they should not be the reason for everything that happens like they are portrayed in STO right now.
Image

The Borg were supposed to be the greatest threat in the Star Trek universe, but now they are a laughing stock in STO, I can only imagine the Iconians would be the same.

Re: Debriefing Session 28

Posted: Fri March 20th, 2015 9:44 am
by Husker
The question is, what happens after we defeat the Iconians??? They will have to come up with some new, more powerful enemy.

Assimilated Iconians???

Re: Debriefing Session 28

Posted: Fri March 20th, 2015 1:07 pm
by Baz
It'll be the greatest enemy of all:

Maintenance Mode :lol:

Re: Debriefing Session 28

Posted: Fri March 20th, 2015 2:50 pm
by Ledgend1221
The only thing that could actually be threatening now is our mirror universe selves.