Page 2 of 2

Re: Good News for Star Trek 3

Posted: Thu January 22nd, 2015 10:13 pm
by Jega Grant
cmdraftbrn wrote:cant be worse than into 2.5hrs of lensflares and one liners with 20mins of one primary color saturation.
I agree with this statement :)

Re: Good News for Star Trek 3

Posted: Thu January 22nd, 2015 10:15 pm
by Sysil
Jega Grant wrote:
cmdraftbrn wrote:cant be worse than into 2.5hrs of lensflares and one liners with 20mins of one primary color saturation.
I agree with this statement :)
And yet I would have said 'can't be worse than Star Trek 2009'.

I was proven wrong... :brickwall: